This is a referendum whose proposer address (0x7734a3cb1e760df90dc0ad716a550488747a06a2) is shown in on-chain info below. Only this user can edit this description and the title. If you own this account, login and tell us more about your proposal.

Register a new local asset
No information is stored in this pallet about the local asset
The reason is that we dont need to hold a mapping between the multilocation
and the local asset, as this conversion is deterministic
Further, we dont allow xcm fee payment in local assets

Problem Statement:
- Should Registrar #1 continue to perform human verification for identity verification?

Significance:
- The proposal aims to gather the general opinion on whether to maintain the human verification step.
- The current human verification process is time-consuming and costly.
- The automatic checks have improved to the point where the manual verification becomes unnecessary.

Proposed Solution:
- If the proposal passes, Registrar #1 will continue to perform human verification.
- If the proposal does not pass, the human verification step will be removed.

Expected Outcomes:
- The outcome of the vote will likely mirror on Polkadot as well.
- The value proposition is to reduce time, costs, and improve user experience.

Referendum #99